AZ Supreme Court: Charter Cities May Set Their Own Election Dates Featured

State Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Prescott and other Charter Cites Regarding their ability to set Election Dates 


Big Idea

  • The City of Prescott, a charter city, holds municipal elections in odd-numbered years 
  • The AZ Legislature attempted to change the law to force all elections in the state to be held in even-numbered years
  • The City of  Tucson sued over the matter, the City of Prescott filed an amicus brief in the case
  • The Arizona Supreme Court affirms the right of charter cities to determine their own municipal elections
  • Read more…

In other words, why does the State have any say over Prescott’s election dates???

PRESCOTT, AZ (April 16, 2021) – Earlier this week, the Supreme Court of the State of Arizona ruled in favor of the City of Tucson, Prescott and other charter cities, allowing them to continue to determine when to hold local elections.  Upon direction from Council, Prescott filed an amicus brief in the case State of Arizona v City of Tucson. The case dealt with whether charter cities would be required by state statute to move their local elections (i.e. mayor and council elections) to the fall of even numbered years.   The Court ruled 5-1 in favor of charter cities, allowing them to determine when to hold local elections. Here is the summary of the decision from the court.

Arizona Revised Statutes § 16-204.01 requires political subdivisions to consolidate local elections with state and national elections when voter turnout for the former significantly decreases. Our constitution’s “home rule charter” provision, article 13, § 2, gives charter cities autonomy over matters of purely municipal concern. We are asked to decide whether the home rule charter provision precludes application of § 16-204.01 to a city whose charter requires electing local officials on non-statewide election dates. Whether to align municipal elections with state and national elections or hold them in different years is purely a matter of municipal interest and not a statewide concern. Consequently, we hold that § 16-204.01 cannot apply to require a city to consolidate local elections with state and national elections if its charter provides otherwise. 

“We are pleased with the Court’s ruling,” said City Attorney Jon Paladini. “As a charter city, Prescott has a tradition of holding Council elections on odd numbered years, as we are doing in 2021. This decision allows the City to continue this practice.”

Arizona’s Charter Cities:

  • Avondale
  • Bisbee
  • Casa Grande
  • Chandler
  • Douglas
  • Flagstaff
  • Glendale
  • Goodyear
  • Holbrook
  • Mesa
  • Nogales
  • Peoria
  • Phoenix
  • Prescott
  • Scottsdale
  • Tempe
  • Tucson
  • Winslow
  • Yuma

Editor’s note: We are reproducing the entire Supreme Court Decision below (yes, all 20 pages!) to help provide an historical background on this issue.

Rate this item
(0 votes)
Last modified on Friday, 16 April 2021 11:39
John Heiney

Community Outreach Manager

Communications, Economic Development and Tourism

Latest Tweets

A visual restaurant table reservation system increases the overall efficiency and it will increase the sales of the… https://t.co/1bxCZsBBPD
Worried 😌 about the certificate design of your upcoming event? Here's the solution for you! 👇👇… https://t.co/X8LCrRLVek
Planning for virtual events and need a website? Are you worried 😌? Here you go! 👇👇 Step-by-step guidelines to mak… https://t.co/y3oGZFcVQG
Follow Themewinter on Twitter

Post Gallery

Governor Ducey Picks Water, Finance Experts for Historic Water Infrastructure Board

Cocktails from the Garden

Arizona Capitol Lit Purple In Recognition Of Domestic Violence Awareness Month

But, Monsoon Season is Over, Isn't It?

Gas Prices in Phoenix Rise Sharply in the Last Week

Slow Down in Traffic Zones

Roadwork on Prescott East Highway Starts 10/10

Movie Review: Running the Bases

Prescott Weekend Events: September 30 - October 2